Landscape, Nature and Travel Photography

The much-awaited Adobe Lightroom 2.0 was released July 29th after a brief 4 month Beta period. With out hesitation, for reasons I’ll explain later, I upgraded my copy of Lightroom to version 2 the day it was announced. Now that I’ve had a chance to use the application in real world conditions for the past week I wanted to share my impressions of it.

Since Lightroom went into its initial Beta I’ve been sold on the concept of non-destructive editing of my RAW files. Lightroom 1.0 for all intents and purposes was a great first step combining a state of the art RAW converter, basic digital asset management technology and thanks to Phil Clevenger a revolutionary user interface. Additional functionality to ease printing and web gallery output rounded out the application. Streamlined to help photographers more quickly manage large and small quantities of photography alike Lightroom’s release still seemed to confuse some diehard Photoshop users. What about localized edits and masks? For that Lightroom 1.0 users would still need to rely on Photoshop, initiating the editing of a file in Lightroom and working on a copy in Photoshop. All in all a great first step but far from reaching it’s full potential.

Enter Lightroom 2.0, building on the applications core functionality non-destructive photo editing has been taken to the next level. In version 2 the strengths of each core function has been enhanced. The new features that are making the biggest impact in my day-to-day use of the program include:

Smart Collections

Click To Enlarge

This feature single-handedly was the biggest reason behind my upgrade. When I learned this feature was in Lightroom 2 Beta I knew I would upgrade to version 2 immediately. The manual collections with in the first version of Lightroom were helpful, but severely limiting. More times than I can count I’ve needed to generate collections based on specific keywords (location, subject, etc.), date or rating. The ability to dynamically pull together collections of images across multiple photo sets is incredibly helpful and a huge time saver. This is especially true when looking to create a new collection or build out existing collections as new photos are added to an image library.

Local Adjustments
Lightroom 1.x was all about global adjustments such as color correction, curve adjustments, vignetting, etc. Lightroom 2 now has the ability to apply local adjustments through the following editing tools: Crop Overlay tool, Spot Removal brush, Red Eye Correction tool, Graduated Filter mask, and Adjustment Brushes mask. The Crop Overlay tool provides a quick means of cropping and even leveling ones photo. The Spot Removal brush has been enhanced to clone or heal with a user defined opacity. The Red Eye Correction tool now provides a drag and correct feature to customize the shape of the correction area. The Graduated Filter mask enables gradient-based masks to adjust exposure, brightness, etc. (more on this below). Finally the Adjustment Brush mask enables you through a brush tool to adjust exposure, brightness, contrast, saturation, clarity, sharpness, color and even skin softness.

Knowing Adobe I can see the types of Local Adjustment tools expanding in the future and/or having the existing tools refined further. For images that require minor edits or tweaks these editing tools give photographers a greater degree of flexibility and saves time in cutting out the need to use Photoshop for relatively basic types of edits. I wasn’t missing localized edits too badly in the first version of Lightroom, but now that I have them at my fingertips I don’t know how I lived with out them.

Graduated Filter Masks

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

This local adjustment tool is worthy of noting individually due to the broad impact it likely will have on my work and the work of others. Managing scenes with a dynamic range beyond the capabilities of a cameras film or sensor has troubled photographers for decades. These days people are increasingly using HDR to deal with this or are double-processing RAW files. For those like myself that prefer pre-processing techniques Graduated Neutral Density Filters have been the solution.

The Graduated Filter masks provide a means to handle an image in a similar fashion to both double-processing and the use of Graduated Neutral Density filters. A Graduated Filter mask(s) can be applied adjusting exposure and/or brightness. Rather than processing the same RAW file twice to double-process or use a Graduated Neutral Density filter when taking a photo one can simply apply the appropriate mask to balance the exposure. It should be noted these masks aren’t just limited to exposure and brightness adjustments. Graduated filter masks can also be applied for contrast, saturation, clarity, and sharpness adjustments.

Does this function equate to the death knell of Graduated Neutral Density filters? I would argue no. Being able to manage light before it reaches ones film or sensor will never go out of style. Certainly use of the Graduated Filter mask can only help, but for my line of work it’s not a replacement. Over time perhaps my tune will change. In the meantime I look forward to experimenting with this adjustment tool to find its limits and sweet spot of use.

Centralized UI for Editing Tools
From a User Interface (UI) perspective the already streamlined Lightroom interface has been improved. When in the “Develop” module of the application, editing tools used for local adjustments are now tightly centralized in the upper right hand corner of the screen. Having the Crop Overlay tool, Spot Removal brush, Red Eye Correction tool, Graduated Filter mask, and Adjustment Brushes mask in one consistent location is a real time saver particularly if using a large monitor or dual screens.

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Volume Management

Click To Enlarge

Lightroom 2 now has a more intuitive means of visually displaying photo directories on their respective hard drives and the status of the drive to let you know if the files can be accessed. Seemingly simple in concept this was lacking in the first version of the application and was a pet peeve of mine. In the original version of Lightroom it was a common occurrence to navigate through your library find a photo set, load the set to view image previews, click on an image and then be told the image was off-line. For those with photos stored across multiple drives the inclusion of this feature now makes it easier to identify where content resides and whether or not the drive is connected or turned on saving you time and frustration.

CS3 Integration

Click To Enlarge

Expanding on the “Edit in Adobe Photoshop” feature it is now possible in Lightroom 2 to select photographs and “Open as Smart Object in Photoshop”, “Merge to Panorama in Photoshop”, “Merge to HDR in Photoshop” or “Open as Layers in Photoshop”. Clearly the big take away from these added functions are Adobe’s willingness to streamline more complex image creation. I don’t expect Lightroom to pick up built-in HDR or Panoramic functionality, but the fact it is now easier and faster to utilize this functionality in Photoshop is worthy of praise.

Multiple Display Support
The majority of photographers dream of having a computer setup utilizing multiple monitors. For those lucky enough to have a multiple monitor configuration on their workstation or laptop this feature will make you very happy. In this version of Lightroom Adobe took multiple monitor support one step further by providing 4 multiple display functions to assist in image sorting, ranking and comparison. The multiple display functions include Grid, Loupe, Compare and Survey.

These display options should sound familiar as they’re the same display options available in the default single monitor mode. The loupe view for the second monitor does include 3 viewing mode options: Normal, Live and Locked. The Normal mode displays the same image on both monitors with the option to set a different zoom ratio. This is helpful when evaluating subtle edits. The Live mode turns the second monitor into one large loupe displaying the portion of the image your cursor is over in the scaled original on the main monitor. The Locked mode displays a fixed size preview of an image on the second monitor. Changing the image requires the use of keyboard commands “alt/option and Enter”.

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Click To Enlarge

Enhanced Sharpness Tool

The ability to make localized adjustments for sharpness is another time saving function, but what really makes this function note worthy is the ability to utilize Auto Masks. After specifying your brush size, edge softness and flow rate you can activate the “Auto Mask” option. When active brush strokes are confined to areas of similar color. This works particularly well when keeping sharpness adjustments to specific objects with in your image. As with other localized adjustments a circular point will mark the spot of the completed adjustment. Mousing over the circular point will activate a highlight of the effected area.

Other Features of Note

• 64-bit processing support - For those with the latest Mac OS and Windows systems Lightroom will take advantage of their advanced memory handling capabilities.
• Print Packages - Quickly choose and customize print package layouts to conserve paper and ink.
• Output Sharpening - Select from sharpening presets for different types of print and web output.
• Enhanced Batch Processing - In addition to naming and organizing photos on import from your CF cards it is now possible to apply preset adjustments.
• Camera Profiles - Lightroom 2 (and Camera RAW 4.5) now support alternate camera profiles that can be loaded and referenced in the Camera Calibration panel. Profiles that match camera manufacturer color appearances such as Canon’s Picture Styles (Standard, Landscape, Neutral, Portrait and Faithful) could be applied via this feature.

Concluding Thoughts
The Adobe Lightroom team has been exceptionally busy the past several months and they’ve done an exceptional job in hearing their users via the Beta program. Lightroom 2 has been one of the best upgrades I’ve invested in over the past year or two. As Lightroom improves so too does my end product and overall productivity. As a photographer striving to make the most of his limited time Lightroom has proven to be an essential asset.

Adobe Lightroom Features and Shortcuts - Lightroom Journal

Technorati Tags: Adobe, Lightroom 2, Lightroom, software, review

Some very exciting services and applications launched today including a new search engine Cuil.com and Adobe Lightroom 2. Having used Adobe Lightroom 2 Beta I’ve been very impressed and opted to buy Lightroom 2 at the first notice of its availability. Unfortunately after purchasing the Lightroom 2 Upgrade per the install PDF I was unable to get the program started. I was not given the option to reference my existing install and my Lightroom 1.0 serial number was not considered valid. Later I received an email that provided the upgrade serial number. Once entered then my old serial number was entered and then the application loaded. If only the install notes set my expectations correctly. Adobe gets the Good and the Bad reference in my post.

The Ugly is reserved for the new search engine Cuil. Cuil was getting tons of press today and was being blindly praised as the new kid on the block to challenge Google. As most found out today who tried Cuil it was far from impressive and probably could be considered to have one of the worst Web 2.0 lauches of all time. Why the hate on Cuil?

As noted in my first observation of the search engine via my post on FriendFeed:
“Not very impressed with Cuil.com and the seemingly random association of photos to results. Very confusing”

I wasn’t alone in thinking so. Later as I delved into the search engine even more I became even more troubled. When searching for my name in Cuil I knew it wouldn’t be pretty. There are two other Jim Goldstein’s that come up often when searching my name. Lucky for me! One is Jim Goldstein and his Band of Angels. Doh! The other is an eccentric Jim Goldstein with a house often featured in architecture magazines and in sports magazines due to his fanatical attendance to various pro basketball games. Flip a coin as to which is most inappropriate to my photography oriented web site. Sure enough the architecture/basketball Jim Goldstein has his image associated with my web site in Cuil search results. Even worse someone else’s photo of the Golden Gate Bridge is associated with a commercial site of mine.

My two biggest complaints…
First I don’t want another persons photo associated with my web site. The last thing I need is someone confusing my site with that of some eccentric.

Second I don’t want my commercial efforts being negatively impacted because inferior photography is being displayed and randomly associated with my commercial site.

I wrote Cuil about my concerns and due to the frenetic nature of their launch today they never wrote back. If and when they do I’ll follow up on this post. I later found out through another post that they were blaming much of what was being perceived as inaccurate results on technical problems due to a larger than expected spike in traffic.  See Cuil shows us how not to launch a search engine via CNET

Today definitely wasn’t dull. Upgrade problems aside Lightroom 2 is worth a look and if you’re a glutton for punishment check out Cuil.com to see what kind of whacky results are being tied together for your site or photography.

Technorati Tags: Cuil, Lightroom, upgrade, search, technology, software

Up until recently it’s been nearly impossible to know for certain where your online photos might end up on the Internet. As we’ve heard over the years a growing vocal minority will be the first to jump on photographers complaining about online image theft stating “Get used to it. You put it online. That’s how it is.” This argument is anything but true and frustrates the hell out of photographers who know better.

It’s become clear there is a growing interest in new technologies to address the current “wild west” nature of image theft on the Internet by stock agencies and individual photographers alike. Google recently released a research paper on VisualRank that like text search assigns a weighting and ranking to images while also leveraging image-recognition software methods. Although Google is the 800 pound gorilla of search they’ve been beat to the punch by Idée Inc. who recently released a private beta of TinEye. As you’ll see in TinEye’s demonstration video they’ve created an image search that is as simple as a Google search. All an end user has to do is reference an image online or upload a low resolution image and TinEye returns results of where that image is currently found online. What is most impressive is their image matching technology that will match similar images even if they’ve been cropped, resized or Photoshop’d.

I am a born cynic, but after putting TinEye to the test with some of my photos I’ve quickly become a believer and can’t wait for them to expand their search index and hopefully implement a Google Alert like service. At the moment they’ve indexed a relatively small portion of the Internet (roughly 500,000,000 images), but they’re asking beta testers to recommend sites to index. The service at the moment is rather narrow, but I can see where this has legs to quickly expand.

Just to show an example I decided to search one of my more commonly referenced photos of the Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree in New York City. The blog post containing this image has been accessed nearly 50,000 times and it is one of my most popular photos. With out a doubt I knew this would end up somewhere it was not supposed to. In the past by monitoring my web site log I’ve caught a few people using the image with out my knowledge, so I figured this would be a perfect example to test on TinEye.

Click to Enlarge

Sure enough I referenced the image on my blog and found a few more sites (see above) that had slipped by me who have been using my photo without my knowledge or permission.

Granted the jury is still out with TinEye, but my initial experience has been a good one. The simplicity of the interface, the image-recognition capabilities and speed at which it finds images has caught my eye. I’ll definitely be watching TinEye as it develops and provide feedback through its beta stage.

If you’re curious to try TinEye let me know in your comment to this post. I have 50 invites that I can share.

Technorati Tags: copyright, photo, image, search, theft, technology, TinEye

From time to time a lot of buzz will surface about GPS devices for photographers that will track, map and embed GPS coordinates in the EXIF metadata of captured images. I use a GPS in the field when I’m out in remote locations not just for safety but to mark locations I’ve either photographed or plan on revisiting. To date I can’t say that I’ve missed having this information embedded in my EXIF metadata. I suppose it would be of benefit so that I wouldn’t lose the information, but a good photographer is also a good note taker.

This weekend I started to ponder, assuming this information were more commonly embedded, would photographers really be open enough to reveal it on a regular basis for geotagging? I can’t talk for others, but I can talk for myself and I more than likely would not be an open book with this information. For obvious locations I wouldn’t have a problem in sharing the information, but for special areas I’ve spent a great deal of time researching and/or exploring to find I’d likely keep it to my private notes. There is always the possibility of exceptions and I might open up for some friends, but even still it wouldn’t be the general public. Of course I run the risk of playing my cards here and looking like a real hardcase, but I’m just telling the truth. The more effort I’d put forward to find a location the less likely I’d be willing to share it.

What about you?

n

Technorati Tags: photography, GPS, EXIF, metadata, geotagging, gadgets, philosophy